✔️ commonly used by statistical agencies in the european union working group on statistics on income & living conditions (eurostat)
✔️ not tied to the inflation rate nor to a basket of goods or consumable products
✔️ generic calculation that can be broadly applied to different nations or regions
✔️ easy to understand: defaults to 60% of median income
❌ the 60% of median income used in ARPT might appear arbitrary for non-EU analyses
❌ does not account for the intensity/severity of poverty
❌ not really a poverty measure, but an estimated poverty threshold/poverty line
The at-risk-of-poverty threshold (ARPT) is a measure used to define the people whose incomes imply a low standard of living in comparison to the general living standards. Even though some people are not below the effective poverty line, those below the ARPT can be considered “almost deprived”.
This measure is defined as \(0.6\) times the median income for the entire population:
\[
arpt = 0.6 \times median(y),
\]
where \(y\) is the income variable and median
is estimated for the whole population. The details of the linearization of the ARPT are discussed by Deville (1999Deville, Jean-Claude. 1999. “Variance Estimation for Complex Statistics and Estimators: Linearization and Residual Techniques.” Survey Methodology 25 (2): 193–203. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/12-001-x/1999002/article/4882-eng.pdf.) and Osier (2009Osier, Guillaume. 2009. “Variance Estimation for Complex Indicators of Poverty and Inequality.” Journal of the European Survey Research Association 3 (3): 167–95. http://ojs.ub.uni-konstanz.de/srm/article/view/369.).
The R
vardpoor
package (Breidaks, Liberts, and Ivanova 2016Breidaks, Juris, Martins Liberts, and Santa Ivanova. 2016. “Vardpoor: Estimation of Indicators on Social Exclusion and Poverty and Its Linearization, Variance Estimation.” Riga, Latvia: CSB.), created by researchers at the Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia, includes an ARPT coefficient calculation using the ultimate cluster method. The example below reproduces those statistics.
Load and prepare the same data set:
# load the convey package
library(convey)
# load the survey library
library(survey)
# load the vardpoor library
library(vardpoor)
# load the laeken library
library(laeken)
# load the synthetic EU statistics on income & living conditions
data(eusilc)
# make all column names lowercase
names(eusilc) <- tolower(names(eusilc))
# add a column with the row number
dati <- data.table::data.table(IDd = 1:nrow(eusilc), eusilc)
# calculate the arpt coefficient
# using the R vardpoor library
varpoord_arpt_calculation <-
varpoord(
# analysis variable
Y = "eqincome",
# weights variable
w_final = "rb050",
# row number variable
ID_level1 = "IDd",
# row number variable
ID_level2 = "IDd",
# strata variable
H = "db040",
N_h = NULL ,
# clustering variable
PSU = "rb030",
# data.table
dataset = dati,
# arpt coefficient function
type = "linarpt",
# get linearized variable
outp_lin = TRUE
)
# construct a survey.design
# using our recommended setup
des_eusilc <-
svydesign(
ids = ~ rb030 ,
strata = ~ db040 ,
weights = ~ rb050 ,
data = eusilc
)
# immediately run the convey_prep function on it
des_eusilc <- convey_prep(des_eusilc)
# coefficients do match
varpoord_arpt_calculation$all_result$value
## [1] 10859.24
## eqincome
## 10859.24
# linearized variables do match
# vardpoor
lin_arpt_varpoord <- varpoord_arpt_calculation$lin_out$lin_arpt
# convey
lin_arpt_convey <- attr(svyarpt( ~ eqincome , des_eusilc), "lin")
# check equality
all.equal(lin_arpt_varpoord, lin_arpt_convey)
## [1] TRUE
## eqincome
## eqincome 2564.027
## [1] 2559.442
## [1] 50.59093
## eqincome
## eqincome 50.63622
The variance estimator and the linearized variable \(z\) are both defined in Linearization-Based Variance Estimation. The functions convey::svyarpt
and vardpoor::linarpt
produce the same linearized variable \(z\).
However, the measures of uncertainty do not line up, because library(vardpoor)
defaults to an ultimate cluster method that can be replicated with an alternative setup of the survey.design
object.
# within each strata, sum up the weights
cluster_sums <-
aggregate(eusilc$rb050 , list(eusilc$db040) , sum)
# name the within-strata sums of weights the `cluster_sum`
names(cluster_sums) <- c("db040" , "cluster_sum")
# merge this column back onto the data.frame
eusilc <- merge(eusilc , cluster_sums)
# construct a survey.design
# with the fpc using the cluster sum
des_eusilc_ultimate_cluster <-
svydesign(
ids = ~ rb030 ,
strata = ~ db040 ,
weights = ~ rb050 ,
data = eusilc ,
fpc = ~ cluster_sum
)
# again, immediately run the convey_prep function on the `survey.design`
des_eusilc_ultimate_cluster <-
convey_prep(des_eusilc_ultimate_cluster)
# matches
stopifnot(all.equal(
attr(svyarpt( ~ eqincome , des_eusilc_ultimate_cluster) , 'var')[1] ,
varpoord_arpt_calculation$all_result$var
))
# matches
stopifnot(all.equal(varpoord_arpt_calculation$all_result$se ,
SE(
svyarpt( ~ eqincome , des_eusilc_ultimate_cluster)
)[1]))
For additional usage examples of svyarpt
, type ?convey::svyarpt
in the R
console.
This section displays example results using nationally-representative surveys from both the United States and Brazil. We present a variety of surveys, levels of analysis, and subpopulation breakouts to provide users with points of reference for the range of plausible values of the svyarpt
function.
To understand the construction of each survey design object and respective variables of interest, please refer to section 1.4 for CPS-ASEC, section 1.5 for PNAD Contínua, and section 1.6 for SCF.
## arpt SE
## htotval 44521 391.72
## sex htotval se.htotval
## male male 50623.2 455.4800
## female female 39000.0 185.2314
## arpt SE
## ftotval 55680 473.82
## sex ftotval se.ftotval
## male male 61320.0 504.0308
## female female 48856.2 453.7270
## arpt SE
## pearnval 36000 355.77
## sex pearnval se.pearnval
## male male 37200 378.1736
## female female 31200 185.5967
## arpt SE
## deflated_per_capita_income 598.16 1.8529
## sex deflated_per_capita_income se.deflated_per_capita_income
## male male 607.2863 4.266030
## female female 593.8436 2.711941
## arpt SE
## deflated_labor_income 955.28 1.9433
## sex deflated_labor_income se.deflated_labor_income
## male male 1074.9787 1.88908
## female female 890.7655 1.51126
## Multiple imputation results:
## with(scf_design, svyarpt(~networth))
## scf_MIcombine(with(scf_design, svyarpt(~networth)))
## results se
## networth 115250.4 4678.086
## Multiple imputation results:
## with(scf_design, svyby(~networth, ~hhsex, svyarpt))
## scf_MIcombine(with(scf_design, svyby(~networth, ~hhsex, svyarpt)))
## results se
## male 157268.4 6523.353
## female 44178.0 3877.152
## Multiple imputation results:
## with(scf_design, svyarpt(~income))
## scf_MIcombine(with(scf_design, svyarpt(~income)))
## results se
## income 42285.27 775.3165
## Multiple imputation results:
## with(scf_design, svyby(~income, ~hhsex, svyarpt))
## scf_MIcombine(with(scf_design, svyby(~income, ~hhsex, svyarpt)))
## results se
## male 54348.25 1512.9449
## female 24255.66 852.8023